Researches of Weather Pattern and Boundary Layer Structure Characteristic on Serious Air Pollution Days in Urumqi

LI Xia;YANG Jing;MA Jun;WANG Jiang;ZHAO Ke-Ming;REN Quan;ZHAO Yong

PDF(1310 KB)
Plateau Meteorology ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5) : 1414.
articel

Researches of Weather Pattern and Boundary Layer Structure Characteristic on Serious Air Pollution Days in Urumqi

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Using the real time meteorological observational data and daily air pollution index (API) from January 2004 to April 2009, the statistics were performed with regard to temperal distribution, 500 hPa circulation pattern, surface pressure pattern and corresponding boundary layer structure on serious air pollutiondays  with daily API above Ⅳ level. The results show that the occurrence frequencies of serious air pollution lasting for one, two, three and four days are 32.2%, 23.3%, 18.5% and 11.0%,respectively. The proportion of  500 hPa zonal circulation  is relatively high with value of 86.3%, but for the meridional circulation only below 9.6% on high air pollution days. According to the location of surface high pressure center (SHPC), the occurrence frequency reaches 86.3% when Urumqi is in the rear of the SHPC, and then  the frequency of 9.6% is for the location at the bottom of the SHPC. The frequencies of the other two patterns are relatively low. The vertical structures of the average profiles such as temperature, relatively humidity and wind of grade Ⅲ air quality days are almost in agreement with that of average  profiles in winter. Furthermore, the strong temperature inversion, lower wind speed and relatively deep easterly or southeasterly flows make great contributions to formation of serious air pollution. The relationship between serious air pollution and fog is significant with the  fog occurrence frequency of 81.3%. Moreover, the air quality tends to be poor under conditions of the vertical structure with wet at low level but dry at upper level and inversion at 20:00(Beijing  time) on the  day before that day.

Key words

Serious air pollutio / Circulation situatio / Surface pressure fie / Boundary layer struc / Atmospheric profile

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Xia , YANG Jing , MA Jun , WANG Jiang , ZHAO Ke-Ming , REN Quan , ZHAO Yong. Researches of Weather Pattern and Boundary Layer Structure Characteristic on Serious Air Pollution Days in Urumqi. Plateau Meteorology. 2012, 31(5): 1414

References

[1]任阵海, 苏福庆, 陈朝晖, 等. 夏秋季节天气系统对边界层内大气中PM10浓度分布和演变过程的影响[J]. 大气科学, 2008, 32(4): 741-751.
[2]任阵海, 万本太, 苏福庆, 等. 当前我国大气环境质量的几个特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2004, 17(1): 1-6.
[3]陈朝晖, 程水源, 苏福庆, 等. 北京地区一次重污染过程的大尺度天气型分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2007, 20(2): 99-105.
[4]刘熙明, 胡非, 邹海波, 等. 北京地区一次典型大雾天气过程的边界层特征分析[J]. 高原气象, 2010, 29(5): 1174-1182.
[5]马雁军, 崔劲松, 刘晓梅, 等. 1987-2002年辽宁中部城市群大气污染物变化特征分析[J]. 高原气象, 2005, 24(3): 428-435.
[6]马雁军, 左洪超, 张云海, 等. 辽宁中部城市群大气能见度变化趋势及影响因子分析[J]. 高原气象, 2005, 24(4): 623-628.
[7]吕梦瑶, 刘红年, 张宁, 等. 南京市灰霾影响因子的数值模拟[J]. 高原气象, 2011, 30(4): 929-941.
[8]靳利梅, 史军. 上海雾和雾日数的气候特征及变化规律[J]. 高原气象, 2008, 27(增刊): 138-143.
[9]严明良, 缪启龙, 袁成松, 等. 沪宁高速公路一次大雾过程的数值模拟及诊断分析[J]. 高原气象, 2011, 30(2): 428-436.
[10]张恒德, 饶晓琴, 乔林. 一次华东地区大范围持续雾过程的诊断分析[J]. 高原气象, 2011, 30(5): 1255-1265.
[11]吴兑, 廖国莲, 邓雪娇, 等. 珠江三角洲天气的近地层输送条件研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 2008, 19(1): 1-9.
[12]王式功, 杨德保, 李腊平, 等. 兰州城区冬半年冷锋活动及其对空气污染的影响[J]. 高原气象, 1998, 17(2): 142-149.
[13]Li Xia, Xin Yu, Zhang Guangxin. Air pollutants and its transport characteristics of multi-cities in central Xinjiang, China[C]. The Bioinformatica and Biomedical Engineering, 2009. ICBBE 2009. 3rd International Conference. New York: IEEE Xplore, 2009: 1-4.
[14]陈雷华, 余晔, 陈晋北, 等. 2001-2007年兰州市主要大气污染特征分析[J]. 高原气象, 2011, 30(6): 1627-1633.
[15]Mamtimin B, Meixner F X. The characteristics of air pollution in the semi-arid city of Urumqi (NW China) and its relation to climatological process[J]. Geophys Res Abs, 2007, 9, 06537.
[16]金煜. 北京等45城市空气质量超标. 新京报电子版, http://epaper.bjnews.com.cn/html/2011-08/01/content_259856.htm?div=-1. 2011年8月1日.
[17]Flemming G. The importance of air quality in human biometeorology[J]. Int J Biometeorol, 1996, 39: 192-196.
[18]McGregor G R, Bamzelis D. Synoptic Typing and its application to the investigation of weather air pollution relationships, Birmingham, United Kingdom[J]. Theor Appl Climatol, 1995, 51: 223-236.
[19]Robert E D, David A G. A synoptic climatological analysis of air quality in the Grand Canyon National Park[J]. Atmos Environ, Part A. General Topics, 1993, 27(5): 713-727.
[20]Sindosi O A, Katsoulis B D, Bartzokas A. An objective definition of air mass types affecting Athens, Greece; the corresponding atmospheric pressure patterns and air pollution levels [J]. Environ Technol, 2003, 24(8): 947-962.
[21]李景林, 郑玉萍, 刘增强. 乌鲁木齐市低空温度层结与采暖期大气污染的关系[J]. 干旱区地理, 2007, 30(4): 519-525.
[22]冯银厂, 彭林, 吴建会, 等. 乌鲁木齐市环境可自重TSP和PM10来源解析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2005, 25 (增刊) : 30-33.
[23]蒋维楣, 孙鉴泞, 曹文俊, 等. 空气污染气象学教程[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2004.
[24]胡非, 洪忠祥, 雷孝恩. 大气边界层和大气环境研究进展[J]. 大气科学, 2003, 27(4): 712-728.
[25]张家宝. 新疆短期天气预报指导手册[Z]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1986: 319-214.
[26]吴彦, 王健, 刘晖, 等. 乌鲁木齐大气污染物的空间分布及地面风场效应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(5): 986-991.
[27]胡晏玲. 乌鲁木齐地区雾对地面大气污染的影响[C]. 中国环境保护优秀论文集(下冊). 2005: 1414-1417.
[28]Hu D,Qiao L,Chen J, et al. Hygroscopicity of inorganic aerosols: Size and relative humidity effects on the growth factor[J].Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2010,3(10): 255-264.
[29]Lee A, Ling T, Chan C. Understanding hygroscopic growth and phase transformation of aerosols using single particle Raman spectroscopy in an electrodynamic balance[J]. Faraday Discuss, 2008, 137: 245-263.
[30]中国气象局. 地面气象观测规范[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003: 24.
[31]高歌. 1961-2005年中国霾日气候特征及变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(7): 761-768.
[32]吴兑. 关于霾与雾的区别和灰霾天气预警的讨论[J]. 气象, 2005, 31(4): 2-7.
PDF(1310 KB)

1559

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/