Characteristics of Flux Footprint over Typical Underlying Surface of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau
Received date: 2022-06-27
Revised date: 2022-12-08
Online published: 2023-09-26
The heterogeneity of the underlying surface affects the accuracy and representativeness of the land-atmosphere flux observation.The study on the flux footprint distribution of complex underlying surface over Qinghai-Xizang Plateau (QXP) is of great significance to the observation and simulation of land-atmosphere interaction and its influence on weather and climate.Flux footprint analysis plays a pivotal role in investigating the spatial representativeness of flux observation information.The Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP) model represents a proficient methodology for computing the flux footprint.Based on the observation data from multiple research stations, including the Qomolangma Atmospheric and Environmental Observation and Research Station, the Ngari Desert Observation and Research Station, the Nam Co Monitoring and Research Station for Multisphere Interactions, the Muztagh Ata Westerly Observation and Research Station, the Southeast Tibet Observation and Research Station for the Alpine Environment in 2013, the FFP model was utilized to investigate the sensitivity of model parameters concerning flux footprint distribution.Additionally, the spatiotemporal characteristics and specific influencing factors of flux footprint distribution at different stations were discussed, thereby providing valuable insights for the erection of future observing stations.The results reveal that the primary determinants of flux footprint are measurement height, wind speed and wind direction.Characterized by an underlying surface of evergreen coniferous forest, flux footprint at Linzhi station exhibits greater sensitivity to measurement height and planetary boundary layer depth compared to the other stations.In the QXP, the spatial extent of the flux footprint derived from the ultrasonic anemometer measurements ranges from approximately 250 m to 500 m.Among the five stations, Qomo station exhibited the lowest frequency of stable stratification times during daytime, representing 15.69% of the daytime data points, whereas Ali station had the lowest occurrence of unstable stratification times during nighttime, comprising for 13.32% of the nighttime data points.At these five stations on the TP, the nocturnal flux footprints demonstrate greater width and extent compared to their daytime counterparts.In summer, due to the influence of monsoon, the axis of flux footprint tends to be more consistent.Lake-land breeze at Nam Co station is the main factor affecting flux footprint, whereas glacier wind at Qomo station is the dominant factor.Linzhi station possesses the smallest footprint due to the smallest mean wind speed, thus demonstrating the highest level of representativeness among these five stations.Lowering the height of observation instruments at Qomo and Nam Co stations could potentially enhance the representativeness of in situ measurements.
Zixin WANG , Lei ZHONG , Yaoming MA , Yunfei FU . Characteristics of Flux Footprint over Typical Underlying Surface of Qinghai-Xizang Plateau[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2023 , 42(5) : 1160 -1171 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2022.00107
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | 蔡旭晖, 2008.湍流微气象观测的印痕分析方法及其应用拓展[J].大气科学, 32(1): 123-132. |
null | 蔡旭晖, 邹青青, 郭梦婷, 等, 2018.大气环境监测结果空间代表性的一个分析实例[J].环境科学学报, 38(6): 2279-2286. |
null | 龚元, 赵敏, 姚鑫, 等, 2017.基于Hsieh和Kljun模型的城市生态系统碳通量贡献区分析与对比[J].环境工程技术学报, 7(2): 225-231. |
null | 赖欣, 范广洲, 华维, 等, 2021.青藏高原陆气相互作用对东亚区域气候影响的研究进展[J].高原气象, 40(6): 1263-1277.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2021.zk018 . |
null | 马耀明, 胡泽勇, 王宾宾, 等, 2021.青藏高原多圈层地气相互作用过程研究进展和回顾[J].高原气象, 40(6): 1241-1262.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2021.zk006 . |
null | 彭谷亮, 刘绍民, 蔡旭晖, 等, 2008.非均匀下垫面湍流通量观测的印痕分析[J].大气科学, 32(5): 1064-1070. |
null | 王介民, 1999.陆面过程实验和地气相互作用研究——从HEIFE到IMGRASS和GAME-Tibet/TIPEX[J].高原气象, 18(3): 280-294. |
null | |
null | 王宇轩, 奥银焕, 李照国, 等, 2021.黑河中下游不同类型下垫面的能量收支差异及其成因研究[J].高原气象, 40(3): 495-509.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2020.00100 . |
null | 徐春萌, 蔡旭晖, 宋宇, 2015.淮河流域重点城市大气污染源区特征的印痕分析[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 51(5): 812-820. |
null | 游庆龙, 康世昌, 李潮流, 等, 2007.青藏高原纳木错气象要素变化特征[J].气象, 33(3): 54-60. |
null | 张志刚, 秦翔, 何立富, 等, 2011.2007年5-6月珠峰北坡不同高度气象要素特征分析[J].气象, 37(8): 977-983. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |