Current Issue

24 December 1986, Volume 5 Issue 4   
  • NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS OF A TWO-LAYER MODEL WITH INTERNAL BOUNDARY OF TOPOGRAPHY
  • Ouyang Shoucheng;Liu Zheng;Meng Guangyi
  • 1986 Vol. 5 (4): 325-331. 
  • Abstract ( ) PDF (397KB) ( )
  • It is intended in the paper the real large scale topography will be treated as internal boundary wall to deal with numerical weather forecast problems with topography. It is quite similar to the treatment of external lateral condition of limited area model.For simplicity, in the paper the terrain of the Tibetan Plateau and Rocky Mountains was firstly taken as a rectangle and possessed E-W(like the Tibetan Plateau) and S-N(like the Rocky Mountains ) orientation, respectively.The experiment without topography shows that the main trough moves eastward and weakens gradually.But incorporation of internal boundary obstacle into two layer model leads to deflecting effects of flows, split of main trough in S-N direction and short wave disturbances in east side of terrain obstacle, especially in S-N terrain orientation (like the Rockies). In the experiment results with and without topography, the weather systems in west side of terrain obstacle are quite stable.It seems that topography only influence the weather in east side of terrain.In the stable experiment, Davies scheme is better than the others to minimise the reflectipn of boundary.
  • CORRECTION OF VERTICAL VELOCITY IN PRESSURE LAYERS DIVIDED BY UNEQUAL INTERVALS
  • Chen Yuchun;Yan Hong
  • 1986 Vol. 5 (4): 342-354. 
  • Abstract ( ) PDF (785KB) ( )
  • So far, we all use the O'Brien's formula to correct the vertical velocity [1], which was derived in vertical pressure layers divided by equal intervals, not by unequal intervals. In this paper the revised correction formula of vertical velocity in pressure layers divided by unequal intervals was given. We calculated the vertical velocity with the same set of data in terms of the abovementioned both formulas. The intercomparisons of both results reveal that: 1. No matter which integrating scheme(upward or downward) we use, there are the difference between the both results, especially over the Plateau area. 2. The more the vertical pressure intervals AP is, the large the difference between both results is, except when integrated from down to up under setting P T=0. 3. Compared with the results in pressure layers divided by equal intervals, when integrated from down to up using correction formula of unequal pressure intervals, the computed vertical velocity at lower layers increase sharply, but those at upper layers decrease obviously. 4. When integrated from up to down, both correction results at some layers and grid points have opposite signs. 5. The difference between both correction results when integrated from up to down is far larger than when integrated from down to up. The maximum value of the difference is the order of ±21.0×10 -4hPa·s -1. Therefore, when computed the vertical velocity in pressure layers divided by unequal intervals we should make use of the revised formula.