论文

雷暴大风落区的天气学模型和物理量参数研究

  • 杨晓霞 ,
  • 胡顺起 ,
  • 姜鹏 ,
  • 万明波 ,
  • 王文青 ,
  • 刘桂才 ,
  • 高慧君 ,
  • 蒲章绪 ,
  • 华雯丽
展开
  • 山东省气象台, 济南 250031;2. 山东省临沂市气象局, 临沂 276004;3. 山东省潍坊市气象局, 潍坊 261000;4. 山东省济南市气象局, 济南 250002;5. 成都信息工程大学大气科学学院, 成都 610072

收稿日期: 2012-08-23

  网络出版日期: 2014-08-28

基金资助

山东省气象局2009年和2010年重点项目(2009sdqxz01,2010sdqx04,2010sdqxz10);公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201106006)

Research of Synoptic Model and Physical Quantity Parameter of Thunder-Gust Winds Impact Area

  • YANG Xiaoxia ,
  • HU Shunqi ,
  • JIANG Peng ,
  • WAN Mingbo ,
  • WANG Wenqing ,
  • LIU Guicai ,
  • GAO Huijun ,
  • PU Zhangxu ,
  • HUA Wenli
Expand
  • Shandong provincial weather bureau, Jinan 250031, China;2. Shandong Linyi weather bureau, Linyi 276004, China;3. Shandong weifang weather bureau, Weifang 261000, China;4. Shandong Jinan weather bureau, Jinan 250002, China;5. Chengdu university of information and technology, Chengdu 610072, China

Received date: 2012-08-23

  Online published: 2014-08-28

摘要

对1971-2008年山东雷暴大风的气候特征、天气系统配置模型和物理量参数特征进行分析研究。结果表明,雷暴大风的天气系统分为四种类型:槽前型、槽后型、副热带高压(下称副高)边缘型和横槽型。春季和秋季以槽前型为主,6月和8月槽后型较多,副高边缘型只出现在7月。副高边缘型的对流不稳定能量最高,0~6 km风垂直切变最小;槽后型风垂直切变最大,对流不稳定能量也较大;槽前型的风垂直切变和对流不稳定能量都较大;横槽型的风垂直切变和对流不稳定能量都较小。在鲁西北和鲁中地区槽前型最多,鲁南地区槽后型最多,横槽型主要影响山东北部和半岛地区,副高边缘型主要影响鲁西北和鲁中地区。在内陆地区,春季大气湿度小,不稳定能量低、上下层温差大、0~6 km风垂直切变大,大风指数大;夏季低层大气暖湿,对流不稳定能量高、风垂直切变小,大风指数小。鲁南地区产生雷暴大风的温湿条件比鲁西北和鲁中地区高。在山东半岛的沿海地区,低层大气湿度大、温度低,对流不稳定能量小,大风指数较小,但是K指数、θse上下层之差和0~6 km风垂直切变较大,低层大气温度和湿度的月变化较小。

本文引用格式

杨晓霞 , 胡顺起 , 姜鹏 , 万明波 , 王文青 , 刘桂才 , 高慧君 , 蒲章绪 , 华雯丽 . 雷暴大风落区的天气学模型和物理量参数研究[J]. 高原气象, 2014 , 33(4) : 1057 -1068 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00057

Abstract

The thunder-gust winds in Shandong Province from 1971 to 2008 were statistical analysed and the climate feature was studied. The circulation system and the occurring areas of 93 times regional thunder-gust winds from 2000 to 2008 were researched. The results show that: Four kinds of thunder-gust winds synoptic models were built mainly by 500 hPa influence system: the southerly air flow in the front of trough model, the northerly air flow in the rear of trough model, the west edge of subtropical high model and the front of the lateral trough for revolving to south model. The physical quantity parameters in 93 times thunder-gust wind processed were ferreted out and analyzed. The thunder-gust winds from June to August accounts 63.1% and most in July. The northwesterly winds were the most wind direction in winds directions of thunder-gust winds. But the southwesterly winds were the most in July. The 8~9 scale wind power of thunder-gust winds take 80.8%. In the spring and autumn the thunder-gust winds produced mostly in southerly air flow in the front of trough. The thunder-gust winds in the northerly air flow in the rear of trough model occurred mainly in June and August. The thunder-gust winds in west edge of subtropical high were mainly in July. In the subtropical high west edge model, the convection available potential energy (CAPE) was most high and the 0~6 km wind vertical shear was the minimum. In the trough rear model, wind vertical shear was the maximum and CAPE was higher. In the trough front model, CAPE and wind vertical shear was all larger. In the lateral trough model CAPE and wind vertical shear were all small. The trough front model was the most in northwest and middle part of Shandong. The trough rear model was the most in south of Shandong. The lateral trough model influence mainly north and peninsula of Shandong and the subtropical high west edge model influence mainly northwest and middle part of Shandong. In the inland in spring atmosphere humidity and CAPE was small, the difference in temperature between high and low level, 0~6 km wind vertical shear and gale index were all large. In summer, low levels in atmosphere are warm and wet and CAPE was high, but 0~6 km wind vertical shear and gale index was all smaller. The temperature and humidity condition in south of Shandong was higher than in northwest and middle part of Shandong. In the coast area of peninsula in Shandong, the low level atmosphere was wet and cold and CAPE was lower and gale index smaller. But K index, the θse difference between high and low level and 0~6 km wind vertical shear were large. The month change of temperature and wet in low level atmosphere was small.

参考文献

[1]俞小鼎, 姚秀萍, 熊廷南, 等. 多普勒天气雷达原理与业务应用[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006: 90-158.
[2]俞小鼎, 张爱民, 郑媛媛, 等. 一次系列下击暴流事件的多普勒天气雷达分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 2006, 17(4): 385-393.
[3]刘娟, 宋子忠, 项阳, 等. 淮北地区一次强风暴的弓形回波分析[J]. 气象, 2007, 33(5): 62-68.
[4]王秀明, 余小鼎, 周小刚, 等, “6.3”区域致灾雷暴大风形成及维持原因分析[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(2):504-514.
[5]姚晨, 郑媛媛, 张雪晨. 长生命史飑线在强、弱对流降水过程中的异同点分析[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(5):1366-1375.
[6]罗慧, 刘荣, 刘勇, 等. 陕西中部一次超强雷暴天气的中尺度特征及成因分析[J]. 高原气象, 2009, 28(4):816-826.
[7]慕熙昱, 党人庆, 陈秋萍, 等. 一次飑线过程的雷达回波分析与数值模拟[J]. 应用气象学报, 2007, 18(1): 42-49.
[8]贺靓, 于超, 吕新民, 等. 渤海中南部海区一次雷暴大风过程分析[J]. 海洋预报, 2011, 28(1): 19-24.
[9]苏爱芳, 银燕, 蔡淼. 夏末华北低槽尾部雹云的生成环境和结构特征[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(5):1376-1385.
[10]夏文梅, 慕熙昱, 徐琪, 等. 一次阵风风过程的数值模拟和分析[J]. 高原气象, 2011, 30(4):1087-1095.
[11]王秀明, 俞小鼎, 周小刚, 等. “6.3”区域致灾雷暴大风形成及维持原因分析[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(2): 504-514.
[12]俞小鼎, 主编. 强对流天气临近预报[M]. 北京: 中国气象局培训中心, 2011:4-7, 55-59.
[13]刘建文, 郭虎. 天气分析预报物理量计算基础[M]. 北京:气象出版社, 2005: 60-105.
[14]齐琳琳, 刘玉玲, 赵思雄. 一次强雷雨过程中对流参数对潜势预测影响的分析[ J]. 大气科学, 2005, 29(4): 543.
[15]朱凯全, 王天奎. WINDEX指数在桃仙机场雷暴大风预报中的应用[J]. 气象水文海洋仪器, 2008(2):62-67.
[16]廖晓农, 王华, 石增云, 等. 北京地区雷暴大风日θ\-e 平均廓线特征[J]. 气象, 2004, 30(11): 35-37.
[17]刘小红, 洪钟祥. 北京地区一次特大强风过程边界层结构的研究[J]. 大气科学, 1996, 20(2): 223-224.
[18]梁爱民, 张庆红, 申红喜, 等. 北京地区雷暴大风预报研究[J]. 气象, 2006, 32(11): 73-80.
[19]廖晓农. 北京雷暴大风日环境特征分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2009, 16(1): 54-62.
[20]秦丽, 李耀东, 高守亭. 北京地区雷暴大风的天气气候学特征研究[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2004, 11(6): 754-762.
[21]苏永玲, 何立富, 巩远发, 等. 京津冀地区强对流时空分布与天气学特征分析[J]. 气象, 2011, 37(2): 177-184.
[22]雷蕾, 孙继松, 魏东. 利用探空资料判别北京地区夏季强对流的天气类别[J]. 气象, 2011, 37(2):136-141.
[23]孙继松, 陶祖钰. 强对流天气分析与预报中的若干基本问题[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(2):164-173.
[24]刘素芳, 张爱华, 杨晓霞, 等. 山东省冰雹资料查询系统[J]. 山东气象, 2000, 20(1): 57-59.
[25]杨晓霞, 张爱华, 贺业坤, 等. 山东省降雹天气系统特征场分析[J]. 山东气象, 2000, 20(1): 17-20.
[26]杨晓霞, 张爱华, 贺业坤, 等. 山东省雹冰雹分县分现预报方法研究与实验[J]. 山东气象, 1998, 18(4): 12-16.
[27]杨晓霞, 张爱华, 贺业坤, 等. 连续冰雹天气的物理量场特征分析[J]. 气象, 2000, 26(4): 50-54.
[28]杨晓霞, 张爱华, 贺业坤, 等. 山东省冰雹客观分县预报系统[J]. 气象, 2002, 28(10): 41-44.
[29]杨晓霞, 李玉华, 李昌义, 等. 山东省天气预报逐级指导技术研究[J]. 气象, 2003, 29(11):3-7.
[30]杨晓霞, 杨贵名, 董旭光, 等. 测站降雹和区域降雹气候特征对比分析[J]. 气象, 2005, 31(5): 55-57.
文章导航

/