论文

干旱区气象因子对蒸发皿蒸发量的影响

  • 陈伯龙 ,
  • 左洪超 ,
  • 高晓清
展开
  • 兰州大学大气科学学院 半干旱气候变化教育部重点试验室, 兰州 730000;2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所 寒旱区陆面过程与气候变化重点试验室, 兰州 730000

收稿日期: 2012-11-05

  网络出版日期: 2014-10-28

基金资助

公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201106043);兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(lzujbky-2014-105);国家自然科学基金项目(41075006)

Effect of Meteorological Factors on Pan Evaporation in Arid Region

  • CHEN Bolong ,
  • ZUO Hongchao ,
  • GAO Xiaoqing
Expand
  • Key Laboratory for Semi-Arid Climate Change of PRC Ministry of Education, College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;2. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Climate Change in Cold and Arid Regions, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2012-11-05

  Online published: 2014-10-28

摘要

根据20 cm 蒸发皿的几何尺寸和架设特征,对Penman蒸发公式中的辐射项Rn和储热项S进行修改,建立了20 cm蒸发皿蒸发模型。利用古浪非均匀近地层观测试验(GHUSLE)中连续14天观测的20 cm蒸发皿逐时蒸发数据对该模型进行验证。结果表明,该模型能够成功地模拟蒸发皿蒸发的日变化过程,模拟的日蒸发量均方根误差和平均相对误差分别为0.72 mm·d-1和6.7%。20 cm蒸发皿蒸发过程中太阳辐射项的贡献约占蒸发皿总体蒸发的1/3,空气动力项的贡献约占2/3。常规气象因子影响蒸发皿蒸发的敏感性试验表明,风速、空气湿度、太阳辐射和气温对蒸发皿蒸发的影响强度依次递减,其蒸发量随这4种气象因子的变化率分别为0.602,-0.590,0.528和0.370。

本文引用格式

陈伯龙 , 左洪超 , 高晓清 . 干旱区气象因子对蒸发皿蒸发量的影响[J]. 高原气象, 2014 , 33(5) : 1251 -1261 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00060

Abstract

According to geometry dimensions and installation characteristic of the 20 cm pan, the evaporation model of 20 cm pan was built by modifying the radiation and thermal storage items in Penman formula. Following, the model was calibrated by the continuous 14-day hourly measurements which were from Gulang Heterogeneous Underlying Surface Layer Experiment (GHUSLE). The analysis results showed that the model could simulate the diurnal variation of pan evaporation. In addition, the results indicated that day performance of the model was good with a root-mean-square error of 0.72 mm·d-1 and a mean relative error ratio of 6.7%. The simulation analysis showed that the contributions of radiative and aerodynamic components in the 20 cm pan evaporation process accounts for about 1/3 and 2/3 of the total pan evaporation, respectively. Sensitivity tests of four kinds of convention meteorological factors on pan evaporation showed that the pan evaporation were most sensitive to the wind speed, followed by air relative humidity, solar radiation and air temperature, and the corresponding rates of changes were 0.602, -0.590, 0.528 and 0.370, respectively.

参考文献

[1]Stanhill G. Is the Class A evaporation pan still the most practical and accurate meteorological method for determining irrigation water requirements?[J] Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 112 (34): 233-236.
[2]IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis[R]//Solomon S D, Qin M M, Chen Z, et al, eds. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, New York: United Kingdom and New York, 2007: 241-254.
[3]Peterson T C, Golubev V S, Groisman P Y. Evaporation losing its strength[J]. Nature, 1995, 377: 687-688.
[4]Brutsaert W, Parlange M B. Hydrological cycle explain the evaporation paradox[J]. Nature, 1998, 396: 30-31.
[5]Brutsaert W. Indications of increasing land surface evaporation during the second half of the 20\+th century[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2006, 33, L20403, doi:10.1029/2006GL027532.
[6]Roderick M L, Farquar G D. The cause of decreased pan evaporation over the past 50 years[J]. Science, 2002, 298: 1410-1411.
[7]Rayner D P. Wind run changes: The dominant factor affecting pan evaporation trends in Australia[J]. J Climate, 2007, 20: 3379-3394.
[8]Zuo Hongchao, Li Dongliang, Hu Yinqiao, et al. Characteristics of climatic trends and correlation between pan-evaporation and environmental factors in the last 40 years over China[J]. Chinese Sci Bull, 2005, 50(12): 1235-1241.
[9]左洪超,鲍艳,张存杰,等. 蒸发皿蒸发量的物理意义、近40年变化趋势的分析和数值实验研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2006,49(3): 680-688.
[10]刘波, 肖子牛, 马柱国. 中国不同干湿区蒸发皿蒸发和实际蒸发之间关系的研究[J]. 高原气象, 2010, 29(3): 629- 636.
[11]Penman H L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soiland grass[J]. Royal Society of London Proceedings(Series A), 1948, 193: 120-146.
[12]Monteith J L. Evaporation and the environment[J]. Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology, 1965, 19: 245-269.
[13]Thom A S, Thony J L, Vauclin M. On the proper employment of evaporation pans and atmometers in estimating potential transpiration[J]. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 1981, 107: 711-736.
[14]Pereira A R, Villa Nova N A, Pereira A S, et al. A model for the class A pan coefficient[J]. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 1995, 76: 75-82.
[15]Chu Chiaren, Li Minghsu, Chen Yiying, et al. A wind tunnel experiment on the evaporation rate of Class A evaporation pan[J]. J Hydrol, 2010, 381: 221-224.
[16]Rotstayn L D, Roderick M L, Farquhar G D. A simple pan-evaporation model for analysis of climatesimulations: Evaluation over Australia[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2006, 33, L17715, doi:10.1029/2006GL027114.
[17]Roderick M L, Rotstayn L D, Farquhar G D, et al. On the attribution of changing pan evaporation[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2007, 34, L17403, doi:10.1029/2007GL031166.
[18]Rong Yanshu, Wang Wen, Jiang Haiyan. Changes of pan evaporation in the upper reach of the Yangtze river[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2011, 23(4): 503-509.
[19]马耀明, 王介民. 非均匀陆面上区域蒸发(散)研究概况[J]. 高原气象, 1997, 16(4): 446-452.
[20]刘波, 马柱国, 丁裕国. 中国北方近45年蒸发变化的特征及与环境的关系[J]. 高原气象, 2006, 25(5): 840-848.
[21]Yang Hanbo, Yang Dawen. Climatic factors influencing changing pan evaporation across China from 1961 to 2001[J]. J Hydrol, 2012, 414-415: 184-193.
[22]Ji Yuhe, Zhou Guangsheng. Important factors governing the imcompatible trends of annual pan evaporation:evidence from a small scale region[J]. Climatic Change, 2011, 106: 303-314.
[23]顾欣, 康为民, 龙先菊, 等. 黔东南气温变化对蒸发皿蒸发量的影响分析[J]. 高原气象,2012, 31(6): 1761-1766.
[24]陈伯龙, 左洪超, 高晓清, 等. 20 cm蒸发皿蒸发量的数学物理模型研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(2): 422-430.
[25]王丽娟, 左洪超, 陈继伟, 等. 遥感估算绿洲-沙漠下垫面地表温度及感热通量[J]. 高原气象, 2012, 31(3): 646-656.
[26]Linacre E T. Estimating U.S. Class A pan evaporation from few climate data[J]. Water International, 1994, 19(1): 5-14.
[27]Liu Qiang, Xia Xinghua. Contribution of meteorological variables to changes in potential evaporation in Haihe River Basin, China[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13: 1836-1845.
[28]Xu Chongyu, Gong Lebing, Jiang Tong, et al. Analysis of spatial distribution and temporal trend of reference evapotranspiration and pan evaporation in Chang jiang (Yangtze River) catchment[J]. J Hydrol, 2006, 327(1-2): 81-93.
文章导航

/