高原气象

高原气象 >

2017 , Vol. 36 >Issue 1: 98 - 106

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2016.00009

论文

洱海湖滨农田下垫面大口径闪烁仪与涡动相关仪测量的湍流热通量对比分析

  • 徐安伦 ,
  • 李建 ,
  • 彭浩 ,
  • 孙绩华
展开
  • 大理国家气候观象台, 大理 671003;中国气象科学研究院, 北京 100081;云南省气象科学研究所, 昆明 650034

收稿日期: 2015-02-13

  网络出版日期: 2017-02-28

基金资助

云南省气象局科技项目（YZ201305）；公益性行业（气象）科研专项（GYHY201406001）；国家自然科学基金（41165001）；大理州气象局2015年度科技项目

收起

Comparison of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes over Farmland Underlying Surface of Erhai Lakeside Region Measured from Large Aperture Scintillometer and Eddy-covariance System

  • XU Anlun ,
  • LI Jian ,
  • PENG Hao ,
  • SUN Jihua
Expand
  • Dali National Climate Observatory, Dali 671003, China;Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;Yunnan Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Kunming 650034, China

Received date: 2015-02-13

  Online published: 2017-02-28

Fold

摘要

利用大理国家气候观象台大口径闪烁仪（LAS）和涡动相关仪（EC）在洱海湖滨农田下垫面的同步观测资料，比较分析了两种仪器测量湍流感热和潜热通量的差异特征。结果表明，LAS测得的湍流感热和潜热通量与EC测得的均有较高的相关性，相关系数分别为0.85和0.90。两种仪器测量结果差异均存在显著的昼夜和季节变化。昼夜变化表现为白天时段LAS的平均感热（潜热）通量比EC的偏小15.6 W·m-2（偏大94.6 W·m-2）；夜间时段则相反，LAS比EC的偏大9.3 W·m-2（偏小40.6 W·m-2）。季节变化表现为湿季（5-8月、10月）LAS的平均感热通量比EC的偏小6.9 W·m-2，干季（4月）LAS的平均潜热通量比EC的偏小2.1 W·m-2，其他月份则相反，LAS比EC测得的感热（潜热）偏大5.7（18.1）W·m-2。

关键词： 大口径闪烁仪; 涡动相关仪; 感热通量; 潜热通量

本文引用格式

徐安伦 , 李建 , 彭浩 , 孙绩华 . 洱海湖滨农田下垫面大口径闪烁仪与涡动相关仪测量的湍流热通量对比分析[J]. 高原气象, 2017 , 36(1) : 98 -106 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2016.00009

Abstract

The sensible and latent heat fluxes were determined with a Large Aperture Scintillometer (LAS) which was set up over farmland underlying surface of Erhai Lakeside region with a path length of 1938 m.These large-scale sensible and latent heat fluxes were compared with local-scale Eddy-covariance System (EC) measurements.The results showed excellent agreement for the sensible and latent heat fluxes measured by LAS and EC with the correlation coefficient up to 0.85 and 0.90, respectively, and revealed clear diurnal variation and season change for the difference of heat fluxes.The diurnal variation demonstrated that sensible heat flux measured by LAS was 15.6 W·m-2 lower than that by EC and latent heat flux measured by LAS was 94.6 W·m-2 higher than that by EC in daytime, however, it was contrary in nighttime.The season change displayed that monthly mean sensible heat flux measured by LAS was 6.9 W·m-2 lower than that by EC in wet season (May to August, October) and monthly mean latent heat flux measured by LAS was 2.1 W·m-2 lower than that by EC in dry season (April), but other month was on the contrary.

Key words： Large aperture scint; Eddy-covariance syst; Sensible heat flux; Latent heat flux

参考文献

[1]Chehbouni A, Watts C, Lagouarde J, et al.2000.Estimation of heat and momentum fluxes over complex terrain using a large aperture scintillometer[J].Agricul Forest Meteor, 105(1):215-226.
[2]Foken T, G?ockede M, Mauder M, et al.2004.Post-field data quality control[C]//Lee X, Massman W, Law B, et al.Handbook of micrometeorology:A guide for surface flux measurement and analysis.Kluwer Academic Publishers, 181-208.
[3]Kipp, Zonen.2012.LAS MkⅡ large aperture scintillometer instruction manual[Z].Holland:Netherlands Press, 86.
[4]Kleissl J, Gomez J, Hong S, et al.2008.Large aperture scintillometer intercomparison study[J].Bound-layer Meteor, 128(1):133-150.
[5]Liu S M, Xu Z W, Wang W Z, et al.2011.A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(4):1291-1306.
[6]Monteith J, Unswrth M.2013.Principles of Environmental Physics:Plants, animals, and the atmosphere[M].Boston:Elsevier/Academic Press, 302.
[7]Ali Mamtimin, He Qing, Huo Wen, et al.2010.Intercomparison of sensible heat fluxes measured by large aperture scintillometer and eddy covariance system in the hinterland of Taklimakan desert[J].Adv Earth Sci, 25(11):1228-1236.DOI:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1228.<br/>艾力·买买提明, 何清, 霍文, 等.2010.塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地LAS和EC观测感热通量对比分析[J].地球科学进展, 25(11):1228-1236.
[8]Guo Wei, Liu Shoudong, Liu Shaomin, et al.2013.Analysis on the applicability of similarity theory in large aperture scintillometer observations[J].Plateau Meteor, 32(4):944-955.DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2012.00090.<br/>郭伟, 刘寿东, 刘绍民, 等.2013.大孔径闪烁仪观测中的相似理论适用性分析[J].高原气象, 32(4):944-955.
[9]Hao Xiaocui, Zhang Qiang, Yang Zesu.2015.Impact of vertical sensible heat advection on differences between LAS and EC measured sensible heat flux over the Loess Plateau in central Gansu, China[J] J Desert Res, 35(1):211-219.DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2014.00156.<br/>郝小翠, 张强, 杨泽粟.2015.陇中黄土高原垂直感热平流输送对LAS和EC观测感热通量差异的影响[J].中国沙漠, 35(1):211-219.
[10]Hao Xiaocui, Zhang Qiang, Yue Ping, et al.2013.Study of characteristic quantity T<sub>*</sub> by large aperture scintillometer over Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Plateau Meteor, 32(3):665-672.DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2012.0063.<br/>郝小翠, 张强, 岳平, 等.2013.黄土高原大孔径闪烁仪观测特征量T<sub>*</sub>的研究[J].高原气象, 32(3):665-672.
[11]Hao Xiaocui, Zhang Qiang, Yue Ping, et al.2014.Analysis of physical factor of sensible heat flux by LAS over Loess Plateau[J].Plateau Meteor, 33(4):957-966.DOI:10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00042.<br/>郝小翠, 张强, 岳平, 等.2014.黄土高原影响LAS观测感热通量的物理因素分析[J].高原气象, 33(4):957-966.
[12]Huang Miaofen.2003.Advance of research on surface flux[J].Arid Land Geography, 26(2):159-165.<br/>黄妙芬.2003.地表通量研究进展[J].干旱区地理, 26(2):159-165.
[13]Liu Huizhi, Feng Jianwu, Sun Jihua, et al.2014.Eddy covariance measurements of water vapor and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes above the Erhai Lake[J].Science China:Earth Sciences, 44(11):2527-2539.DOI:10.1007/s11430-014-4828-1.<br/>刘辉志, 冯健武, 孙绩华, 等.2014.洱海湖气界面水汽和二氧化碳通量交换特征[J].中国科学:地球科学, 44(11):2527-2539.
[14]Liu Pengfei, Liu Shuhua, Hu Fei, et al.2010.A comparison of the different methods for estimating turbulent fluxes and their errors[J].Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 68(4):487-500.DOI:10.11676/qxxb2010.047.<br/>刘鹏飞, 刘树华, 胡非, 等.2010.湍流通量计算方法和误差的比较研究[J].气象学报, 68(4):487-500.
[15]Liu Shuhua, Mao Yuhao, Hu Fei, et al.2009.A comparative study of computing methods of turbulent fluxes on different underling surfaces[J].Chinese J Geophys, 52(3):616-629.<br/>刘树华, 茅宇豪, 胡非, 等.2009.不同下垫面湍流通量计算方法的比较研究[J].地球物理学报, 52(3):616-629.
[16]Lu Li, Liu Shaomin, Sun Minzhang, et al.2005.Advances in the study of areal surface fluxes with large aperture scintillometer[J].Adv Earth Sci, 20(9):932-939.DOI:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2005.09.0932.<br/>卢俐, 刘绍民, 孙敏章, 等.2005.大孔径闪烁仪研究区域地表通量的进展[J].地球科学进展, 20(9):932-938.
[17]Ma Yaoming, Li Maoshan, Ma Weiqiang, et al.2003.The study of regional land surface heat fluxes over heterogeneous landscape in northwest arid areas and Tibetan Plateau by using satellite remote sensing[J].J Arid Meteor, 21(3):34-42.<br/>马耀明, 李茂善, 马伟强, 等.2003.西北干旱区及高原上卫星遥感非均匀地表区域能量通量研究[J].干旱气象, 21(3):34-42.
[18]Wang Jiemin, Wang Weizhen, Ao Yinhuan, et al.2007.Turbulence flux measurements under complicated conditions[J].Adv Earth Sci, 22(8):791-797.DOI:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2007.08.0791.<br/>王介民, 王维真, 奥银焕, 等.2007.复杂条件下湍流通量的观测与分析[J].地球科学进展, 22(8):791-797.
[19]Wang Lijuan, Zuo Hongchao, Chen Jiwei, et al.2012.Land surface temperature and sensible heat flux estimated from remote sensing over oasis and desert[J].Plateau Meteor, 31(3):646-656.<br/>王丽娟, 左洪超, 陈继伟, 等.2012.遥感估算绿洲-沙漠下垫面地表温度及感热通量[J].高原气象, 31(3):646-656.
[20]Xu Anlun, Sun Jihua, Li Jian, et al.2014.A study on the data processing and quality assessment of the eddy-covariance system at Dali national climate observatory[J].Journal of Yunnan University, 36(2):224-232.DOI:10.7540/j.ynu.20130224.<br/>徐安伦, 孙绩华, 李建, 等.2014.大理涡动相关观测数据的处理及质量评价研究[J].云南大学学报 (自然科学版), 36(2):224-232.
[21]Xu Anlun, Wu Xiaoqing, Xu Liming, et al.2008.Analysis of flux-variance method in estimation of turbulent flux in the surface layer over coastal area[J].J Trop Meteor, 24(6):708-712.<br/>徐安伦, 吴晓庆, 许利明, 等.2008.通量-方差法估算沿海近地面层的湍流通量分析[J].热带气象学报, 24(6):708-712.
[22]Zhu Zhilin, Sun Xiaomin, Jia Yuanyuan, et al.2010.The uncertainty of sensible heat flux measurement over cropland using large aperture scintillometer (LAS)[J].Adv Earth Sci, 25(11):1199-1207.<br/>朱治林, 孙晓敏, 贾媛媛, 等.2010.基于大孔径闪烁仪 (LAS) 测定农田显热通量的不确定性分析[J].地球科学进展, 25(11):1199-1207.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn