论文

两种垂直风廓线的对比及应用Ⅰ:一致性分析

  • 董新宁 ,
  • 方德贤 ,
  • 周国兵 ,
  • 吴钲 ,
  • 张勇 ,
  • 黄安宁
展开
  • 重庆市气候中心, 重庆 401147;重庆市气象科学研究所, 重庆 401147;重庆市气象局, 重庆 401147;重庆市气象台, 重庆 401147;南京大学大气科学学院, 南京 210023

收稿日期: 2015-11-12

  网络出版日期: 2017-06-28

基金资助

公益性行业(气象)科研专项公益性行业(气象)科研专项(GYHY201206028);重庆市科委基础与前沿研究计划项目(cstc2015jcyjA00039);重庆市气象局科技计划项目(2008E13SF188)

Comparison and Application of Two Kinds Vertical Wind Profile Data Part Ⅰ:Consistency Analysis

  • DONG Xinning ,
  • FANG Dexian ,
  • ZHOU Guobing ,
  • WU Zheng ,
  • ZHANG Yong ,
  • HUANG Anning
Expand
  • Chongqing Climate Center, Chongqing 401147, China;Chongqing Institute of Meteorology and Science, Chongqing 401147, China;Chongqing Meteorological Administration, Chongqing 401147, China;Chongqing Meteorological Observatory, Chongqing 401147, China;School of Atmosphere Sciences, Nanjing university, Nanjing 210023, China

Received date: 2015-11-12

  Online published: 2017-06-28

摘要

利用2013年1-9月重庆多普勒天气雷达(CINRAD/SA)和风廓线雷达(TWP8-L)观测到的垂直风廓线数据,就不同高度、不同时间及不同降水条件下二者的一致性进行了分析。研究结果表明:(1)多普勒雷达探测的风廓线资料与同期的风廓线雷达资料在垂直分布和时间变化上表现出较一致的变化趋势,两者探测的风向和风速的相关系数分别为0.90和0.75;(2)风廓线雷达和多普勒雷达探测的风向相关性(标准误差)随高度增加(降低)而逐渐增加(降低),两者间的一致性随高度不断增强。风速间的相关性也随高度增加而增加,但标准误差变化不大,稳定在2~4 m·s-1之间。在不同月份表现出类似的特征,特别是在汛期(69月)风切变从底层到高空具有很好的一致性,呈顺时针旋转;(3)两种探测资料间的一致性受降水影响明显,相对于降水偏少的冬季(1月和2月),在以小到中雨为主的春季(34月)以及中到大雨的主汛期(6-9月),多普勒天气雷达和风廓线雷达探测风廓线间的一致性得到明显增强,特别是在主汛期两者间的一致性是最高的;(4)多普勒雷达和风廓线雷达各高度层平均风向随高度的变化一致性较好,在低层( < 4 km)和高层(>5 km)风向均随高度顺时针旋转。

本文引用格式

董新宁 , 方德贤 , 周国兵 , 吴钲 , 张勇 , 黄安宁 . 两种垂直风廓线的对比及应用Ⅰ:一致性分析[J]. 高原气象, 2017 , 36(3) : 788 -800 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2016.00043

Abstract

Based on the wind vertical profile data observed by Doppler radar (SA) and wind profile radar (TWP8-L) over Chongqing, China during 2013, the characteristics and evolution of wind profiles under four different weather conditions (i.e., clear sky, light rainfall, moderate rainfall and heavy rainfall) have been studied. The main results show that:(1) Under the weather condition of clear sky or light rainfall, the moisture condition is so weak that the wind vertical profiles observed by Doppler radar are mostly identified as "ND" (No Data) and wind speeds (directions) observed by wind profile radar are weak (ill-organized). Meanwhile, the observed vertical wind shears are weak and ill-organized as well, unfavorable for the development and maintenance of convection systems; (2) As for moderate rainfall, precipitation property is dispersed with weak hourly accumulated precipitation amount. The wind directions in lower levels are ill-organized, while consistent southwesterlies prevail over the middle-upper levels with unified directions of vertical wind shears. All the above conditions are favorable for the development and persistence of convection systems; (3) As for heavy rainfall, the wind vertical profiles observed by Doppler radar present good consistency with those observed by those by the wind profile radar. During the period preceding the heavy rainfall events, the easterlies at the lower level gradually change to westerlies at the higher level. Such change favors to trigger convection activity. During the precipitation period, the vertical wind shears with consistent directions and the low-level jets prevailing at the lower-middle levels favor the maintenance of convection systems. At the end of precipitation events, the decreased wind speeds and northerlies at the lower-middle levels lead to disperse of the convection systems.

参考文献

[1]Balsley B B, Farley D T. 1976. Auroral zone winds detected near the tropopause with the Chatanika UHF Doppler radar[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 3(9):525-528.
[2]Farley D T, BalsleY B B, Swartz W E, et a1. 1979. Tropical winds measured by the Arecibo radar[J]. Appl Meteor, 18(2):227-230.
[3]Fukao S Sato T, Yamasaki N, et a1. 1982. Winds measured by a UHF Doppler radar and rawinsondes:comparisons made on twenty-six days (August-September 1977) at Arecibo, PuertoRico[J]. Appl Meteor, 21(9):1357-1363.
[4]Larsen, M F, Rotteger J. 1983. Can a VHF Doppler radar provide synoptic wind data? A comparison of 30 days of radar and radiosonde data[J]. Mon Wea Rev, 111(10):2047-2057.
[5]Strauch R G, Weber B L, Frisch A S, et a1. l987. The precision and relative accuracy of profiler wind measurements[J]. Atmos Oceanic Technol, 4(4):563-571.
[6]Weber B, Wuertz D. 1990. Comparison of rawinsonde and wind profiler radar measurements[J]. Atmos Oceanic Technol, 7(1):157-174.
[7]Wuertz D B, Weber B L, Strauch R G, et a1. 1988. Effects of Precipitation on UHF wind profiler measurements[J]. Atmos Oceanic Techno1, 5(3):450-465.
[8]Dong Baoju, Zhang Ye, Xu Anlun. 2009. Assessment of wind profiler radar data in Plateau area[J]. Meteor Sci Technol, 37(5):560-583.<br/>董保举, 张哗, 徐安伦. 2009.高原地区风廓线雷达资料评估[J].气象科技. 37(5):580-583.
[9]Li Chenguang, Lou Shuyuan, Tao Zhuyu. 2003. Review of wind profiler data of Hong Kong during IOP of HUAMEX and SCSMEX[J]. J Trop Meteor, 19(3):269-276.<br/>李晨光, 刘淑媛, 陶祖钰. 2003.华南暴雨试验期间香港风廓线雷达资料的评估[J].热带气象学报, 19(3):269-276.
[10]Sun Xuying, Han Hui, Duan Haixia, et al. 2008. Comparative Analysis on Wind Data from Atmospheric Wind Profiler and Balloon Sounding[J]. J Arid Meteor, 26(3):48-52.<br/>孙旭映, 韩辉, 段海霞, 等. 2008.风廓线仪与气球测风资料的对比分析[J].干旱气象. 26(3):48-52.
[11]Wan Rong, Zhou Zhimin, Cui Chunguang, et al. 2011. Comparing wind profiler data with radiosonde data and analyzing[J]. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 30(2):130-136.<br/>万蓉, 周志敏, 崔春光, 等. 2011.风廓线雷达资料与探空资料的对比分析[J].暴雨灾害, 30(2):130-136.
[12]Wang Gaili, Liu Liping. 2005. Application of Doppler radar observation to rainfall nowcasting[J]. Meteor Mon, 31(10):12-15.<br/>王改利, 刘黎平. 2005.多普勒雷达资料在暴雨临近预报中的应用[J].气象, 31(10):12-15.
[13]Wang Tianyi, Zhu Keyun, Zhang Jie, et al. 2014. Comparative analysis of wind vector products of wind profiling radar and weather radar[J]. Meteor Sci Technol, 42(2):231-239.<br/>王天义, 朱克云, 张杰, 等. 2014.风廓线雷达与多普勒天气雷达风矢产品对比及相关分析[J].气象科学.
[14]Wang Xin, Bian Lingen, Peng Hao, et al. 2005. The atmospheric wind profiler and radio acoustic sounding system with its applications[J]. J Appl Meteor Sci, 16(5):693-698.<br/>王欣, 卞林根, 彭浩, 等. 2005.风廓线雷达系统探测试验与应用[J].应用气象学报, 16(5):693-698.
[15]Wu Lei, Chen Hongbin, Kang Xue. 2014. Comparison between wind profiler and L band upper-air meteorological sounding system[J]. Meteor Sci Technol, 42(2):225-230.<br/>吴蕾, 陈洪滨, 康雪. 2014.风廓线雷达与L波段雷达探空测风对比分析[J].气象科技, 42(2):225-230.
[16]Yang Mei, Li Yulin, Shan Jiusheng, et al. 2006. Correlation analysis between new generation radar wind profile data and sounding data[J]. Meteor Mon, 32(6):20-24.<br/>杨梅, 李玉林, 单九生, 等. 2006.新一代雷达风廓线与探空风廓线资料相关分析[J].气象, 32(6):20-24.
[17]Zhang Peichang, Du Binyu, Dai Tiepei. 2001. Radar Meteorological[M]. Beijing:China Meteorological Press.
[18]Chen Peng, Liu De, Zhou Yingying, et al. 2015. Analysis of heavy rain caused by shear line over Chongqing[J]. Plateau Meteor, 34(1):82-92. DOI:10. 7522/j. issn. 1000-0534. 2013. 001621.<br/>陈鹏, 刘德, 周盈颖, 等. 2015.一次重庆特大暴雨过程的中尺度分析[J].高原气象, 34(1):82-92.
[19]Zhou Changyan, Tang Xinying, Deng Biao. 2015. Precipitation characteristics and water vapor source analysis of record heavy rainfall process in Sichuan[J]. Plateau Meteor, 34(6):1636-1647. DOI:10. 7522/j. issn. 1000-0534. 2014. 00121<br/>周长艳, 唐信英, 邓彪. 2015.一次四川特大暴雨灾害降水特征及水汽来源分析[J].高原气象, 34(6):1636-1647.
[20]Zhou Zhimin, Wan Rong, Cui Chunguang, et al. 2010. Application of wind profiler radar data in a hailfall process[J]. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 29(3):251-256.<br/>周志敏, 万蓉, 崔春光, 等. 2010.风廓线雷达资料在一次冰雹过程分析的应用[J].暴雨灾害, 29(3):251-256.
[21]Zhou Xinyu, Liao Fei, Sun Guangfeng. 2015. Study on the relationship between mesoscale wind field changes and rainstorm using wind profiler data[J]. Plateau Meteor. 34(2):526-53. DOI:10. 7522/j. issn. 1000-0534. 2013. 00188.<br/>周芯玉, 廖菲, 孙广凤. 2015.广州两次暴雨期间风廓线雷达观测的低空风场特征[J].高原气象, 34(2):526-533.
文章导航

/