三江源地区暴雨的水汽输送源地及路径研究
收稿日期: 2020-08-17
修回日期: 2020-11-20
网络出版日期: 2022-03-17
基金资助
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0105); 风云三号(02批)气象卫星地面应用系统工程项目(ZQC-J19193)
Study on Water Vapor Transport Source and Path of Rainstorm in Sanjiangyuan Area
Received date: 2020-08-17
Revised date: 2020-11-20
Online published: 2022-03-17
利用NCAR/NCEP再分析数据, 首先分析了2018年7月22 -23日(简称“0722”)和8月2 -3日(简称“0802”)三江源地区两次暴雨天气过程的天气形势和水汽输送特征, 然后用WRF模型输出数据驱动HYSPLIT模型, 定量分析两次暴雨的水汽输送路径及各路径的水汽贡献率。研究表明: 两次暴雨的主要影响系统均为三江源东部地区形成的低涡和切变线, 低涡系统的演变和进退对暴雨的强度和落区有很大影响; HYSPLIT模型使用WRF模型输出的高分辨率数据作为初始场, 模拟效果良好; 两次暴雨的主要水汽均来源于西南和东南路径。西南路径的水汽来自孟加拉湾, 通过雅鲁藏布江大峡谷水汽输送通道输送至暴雨区。东南路径的水汽来自于东海和南海, 从广东和湖南等地向西北传输至暴雨区; “0722”暴雨中还存在西北路径的水汽输送, 此路径的水汽输送贡献率较小。
王美月 , 王磊 , 李谢辉 , 王春远 , 王翔跃 . 三江源地区暴雨的水汽输送源地及路径研究[J]. 高原气象, 2022 , 41(1) : 68 -78 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2020.00097
Based on the NCAR/NCEP reanalysis data, the weather situation and water vapor transport characteristics of two typical rainstorm weather processes in Sanjiangyuan on July 22-23 ("0722") and August 2-3 ("0802") were analyzed firstly.Then, the WRF model was used to output data for driving the HYSPLIT model to quantitatively analyzing the water vapor transport of the two storms.The results show: (1) The main influence systems of the two rainstorms are the vortex and shear lines formed in the eastern region of Sanjiangyuan and the evolution and advance and retreat of the vortex system has great influence on the intensity and fall area of the rainstorms.(2) The HYSPLIT model uses the high-resolution data output from the WRF model as the initial field and the simulation works well.(3) There are three main moisture transport routes for the “0722” rainstorm: 10 days before the rainstorm, the gas blocks in the northwest path were located in the western region of Xinjiang and entered the Sanjiangyuan via the northern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, the moisture transport contribution rate is 16%; The air parcels in the southwest path originate from the north of the Bay of Bengal and are transported to Sanjiangyuan through the water vapor transport channel of the Yarlung Zangbo River Grand Canyon, with the water vapor transport contribution rate is 41.5%; Water vapor in the southwest path existed in Guangxi 10 days ago and transported to the rainstorm area through Sichuan and other places, with water vapor transport contribution rate acbeing 42.5%.(4) The water vapor of the "0802" rainstorm is mainly transported to the Sanjiangyuan area via four routes: one route is southwest, and the water vapor of the Bay of Bengal is transported to the rainstorm area through the Yarlung Zangbo River Grand Canyon, the water vapor transport contribution rate is 28%.The remaining three are southeast routes: ten days ago, the main source of water vapor appeared in Guizhou and Hunan and is transported to Sanjiangyuan in the northwest direction, the contribution rate of water vapor transportation of the three routes being 23%, 23% and 26%, respectively.(5) In general, the main water vapors for the two rainstorms come from the southwest and southeast paths.The water vapors in the southwest path come from the Bay of Bengal and are transported to the rainstorm area through the Water vapor transport channel of the Yarlung Zangbo River Grand Canyon.The water vapors along the southeast path are transferred-toward the northwest from Guangdong and Hunan to the rainstorm area.For the rainstorm of "0722", there are also water vapors transport along the northwest path, which has a small contribution rate.
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | 陈红专, 叶成志, 陈静静, 等, 2019.2017年盛夏湖南持续性暴雨过程的水汽输送和收支特征分析[J].气象, 45(9): 1213-1226.DOI: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2019.09.003. |
null | |
null | |
null | 刘菊菊, 游庆龙, 王楠, 2019.青藏高原夏季云水含量及其水汽输送年际异常分析[J].高原气象, 38(3): 449-459.DOI: 10. 7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2018.00138. |
null | 马京津, 高晓清, 2006.华北地区夏季平均水汽输送通量和轨迹的分析[J].高原气象, 25(5): 893-899. |
null | 权晨, 陈斌, 赵天良, 等, 2016.拉格朗日水汽源诊断方法在三江源区的应用[J].应用气象学报, 27(6): 688-697.DOI: 10. 11898/1001-7313.20160605. |
null | 王佳津, 王春学, 陈朝平, 等, 2015.基于HYSPLIT4的一次四川盆地夏季暴雨水汽路径和源地分析[J].气象, 41(11): 1315-1327. DOI: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2015.11.002. |
null | 谢欣汝, 游庆龙, 保云涛, 等, 2018.基于多源数据的青藏高原夏季降水与水汽输送的联系[J].高原气象, 37(1): 78-92.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2017.00030. |
null | 许建伟, 高艳红, 彭保发, 等, 2020.1979-2016年青藏高原降水的变化特征及成因分析[J].高原气象, 39(2): 234-244.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2019.00029. |
null | 杨逸畴, 高登义, 李渤生, 1987.雅鲁藏布江下游河谷水汽通道初探[J].中国科学 (B辑 化学 生物学 农学 医学 地学), 1(8): 97-106. |
null | 姚俊强, 杨青, 毛炜峄, 等, 2018.基于HYSPLIT4的一次新疆天山夏季特大暴雨水汽路径分析[J].高原气象, 37(1): 68-77.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2017.00031. |
null | 苏琳, 袁自冰, 冯志雄, 等, 2016.Hysplit后向轨迹对初始气象场水平及垂直分辨率的敏感性研究(英文)[J].热带气象学报, 32(6): 864-877.DOI: 10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2016.06.008. |
null | 曾钰婷, 张宇, 周可, 等, 2020.青藏高原那曲地区夏季水汽来源及输送特征分析[J].高原气象, 39(3): 467-476.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2019.00120. |
null | |
null | 朱丽, 刘蓉, 王欣, 等, 2019.基于FLEXPART模式对黄河源区盛夏降水异常的水汽源地及输送特征研究[J].高原气象, 38(3): 484-496.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2019.00015. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |