收稿日期: 2023-06-24
修回日期: 2024-02-04
网络出版日期: 2024-09-13
基金资助
中国气象局/农业农村部开放式研究基金项目(KYZX2022-09); 云南省气象局科研项目(YZ202419)
Study of Calculation Water Surface Evaporation in the “Three Lakes” Basin of Central Yunnan
Received date: 2023-06-24
Revised date: 2024-02-04
Online published: 2024-09-13
为科学精准地计算滇中地区水面蒸发量, 基于“三湖”径流区附近玉溪气象站2014 -2021年逐月气象观测资料, 用对比分析、 相关分析等方法分析了FAO PPP-17 Penman公式在该地区水面蒸发计算中的使用效果和误差来源。在此基础上, 针对计算误差产生的原因和周期性变化规律, 引入Morton经验公式等方法, 将Penman公式中的水面反射率、 太阳辐射参数作了随季节而变化的动态化改进。同时基于热量平衡原理, 用误差反推法推导出了一个新的水面热通量估算模型, 并在FAO PPP-17 Penman公式中增加水面热通量项以修正水面热量收支平衡。结果表明: (1)FAO PPP-17 Penman公式计算的研究区水面蒸发量普遍偏大, 平均相对误差为+15.2%, 且误差具有冬季小而夏季大的季节性特征和类似正弦曲线的周期变化规律。计算误差主要源于公式中太阳短波辐射参数取值不当以及忽略了水面热通量的影响, 导致热量收支不平衡。(2)对公式进行动态化参数改进并增加水面热通量后, 计算精度明显提高, 相对误差在±5%、 ±10%和±20%内的准确率比修正前分别提高了40.6%、 42.7%和32.3%。异地使用效果也表明, 改进后的FAO PPP-17 Penman公式在滇中“三湖”径流区内仍具有较高的拟合准确率, ±10%误差范围内的拟合准确率在75%以上。(3)本研究推导出的水面热通量非线性估算模型, 能够合理模拟水体储热量对季节变化和水面辐射强弱的非线性响应, 在滇中“三湖”地区的蒸发计算中取得较满意的结果。
艾永智 , 杨韬 , 杨文春 , 申文熙 , 孙秀芬 , 谷桂华 . 滇中“三湖”流域水面蒸发计算研究[J]. 高原气象, 2024 , 43(5) : 1302 -1311 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2024.00012
In order to scientifically and accurately calculate the water surface evaporation in the central Yunnan region, based on the monthly meteorological data from Yuxi Meteorological Station near the 'Three Lakes' basin in Central Yunnan from 2014 to 2021, the effectiveness of the FAO PPP-17 Penman formula in calculating water evaporation in this area and the error sources is analyzed through comparative analysis and correlation analysis.On this basis, aiming at the sources of calculation errors and the characteristics of seasonal changes, the water surface reflectance and the solar radiation parameters in the Penman formula are dynamically modified with the season changes using Morton empirical formula and other methods.Furthermore, based on the principle of heat balance, a new estimation model of water surface heat flux was derived by using error inverse derivation.The water surface heat flux term is added to the FAO PPP-17 Penman formula to correct the heat balance of the water surface.The results showed that: (1) The water evaporation calculated by the FAO PPP-17 Penman formula in the study area was generally overestimated, with a mean relative error of +15.2%.The error has seasonal characteristics of small in winter and large in summer, and periodic variation characteristics which is similar to a sine curve.The calculation error mainly stems from the inappropriate value of solar short-wave radiation parameters in the formula and the neglect of the influence of water surface heat flux, resulting in an imbalance in the heat budget.(2) After dynamically improving the parameters of the FAO PPP-17 Penman formula and adding the water surface heat flux to it, the calculation accuracy is significantly improved.Compared to the unrevised version, the accuracy with relative errors within ± 5%, ± 10%, and ± 20% increased by 40.6%, 42.7%, and 32.3%, respectively.The results of off-site tests show that the optimized Penman equation exhibits high fitting accuracy in the ‘Three Lakes’ basin of central Yunnan, and the model's accuracy with relative errors within ±10% is over 75%.(3) This study developed a nonlinear estimation model for water surface heat flux, which can reasonably simulate the nonlinear response of water storage heat to seasonal variations and water surface radiation intensity.Furthermore, the model has demonstrated satisfactory results in evaporation calculations within the "Three Lakes" region.
null | |
null | |
null | |
null | 安顺清, 邢久星, 1983.运用彭曼公式计算潜在蒸散量及潜在蒸散量月值划为旬值的方法[J].气象科技(1): 66-70.DOI: 10. 19517/j.1671-6345.1983.01.014.An S Q , Xing J X, 1983.Using the Penman formula to calculate potential evapotranspiration and dividing monthly potential evapotranspiration values into ten-day values[J].Meteorological Technology (1): 66-70.DOI: 10.19517/j.1671-6345.1983.01.014 . |
null | 陈永福, 吴蓓蓓, 王晶晶, 2012.基于多变量经验概率模型的中国粮食产量模拟预测分析[J].系统工程理论与实践, 32(11): 2363-2371. |
null | |
null | 邓根云, 1979.水面蒸发量的一种气候学计算方法[J].气象学报, 37(3): 87-96. |
null | |
null | 封志明, 杨艳昭, 丁晓强, 等, 2004.甘肃地区参考作物蒸散量时空变化研究[J].农业工程学报, 20(1): 99-103. |
null | |
null | 付学功, 董晓丽, 1995.彭曼(Penman)公式在河北平原的应用[J].河北水利科技, 16(2): 8-12. |
null | |
null | 高洁, 赵勇, 姚俊强, 等, 2022.气候变化背景下中亚干旱区大气水分循环要素时空演变[J].干旱区研究, 39(5): 1371-1384.DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2022.05.04.Gao J , |
null | |
null | 郭生练, 程肇芳, 1994.流域蒸散发的气候学计算[J].水文(5): 16-22+64-65.DOI: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.1994.05. 004.Guo S L , Cheng Z F, 1994.Estimation of catchment evapotranspiration by climatic approach[J].Journal of China Hydrology(5): 16-22+64-65.DOI: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852. 1994.05.004 . |
null | 胡顺军, 潘渝, 康绍忠, 等, 2005.Penman-Monteith与Penman修正式计算塔里木盆地参考作物潜在腾发量比较[J].农业工程学报, 21(6): 30-35. |
null | |
null | 黄英, 方绍东, 王宇, 2003.云南省水面蒸发量不同计算方法比较[C]//中国水利学会青年科技工作委员编著.中国水利学会首届青年科技论坛论文集.北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 165-172. |
null | |
null | 牛振红, 孙明, 2003.水面蒸发折算系数的对比观测实验与分析计算[J].水文, 23( 3): 49-51. |
null | |
null | 荣艳淑, 巩琳, 卢寿德, 2018.云南2009-2014年持续性气象水文干旱特征及成因分析[J].水资源保护, 34(3): 22-29.DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.1981.03.04.Rong Y S , |
null | |
null | 施成熙, 牛克源, 陈天珠, 等, 1986.水面蒸发器折算系数研究[J].地理科学, 6( 4): 305-313.DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.1986.04.005.Shi C X , |
null | |
null | 孙芹芳, 1981.10平方米蒸发池水面蒸发实验研究[J].水文(4): 35-40.DOI: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.1981.04.011.Sun Q F , 1981.Experimental study on water surface evaporation in a 10 square meter evaporation pool[J].Journal of China Hydrology(4): 35-40.DOI: 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.1981.04.011 . |
null | 孙夏利, 费良军, 李学军, 2009.我国水面蒸发研究与进展[J].水资源与水工程学报, 20(4): 17-22+25. |
null | |
null | 童宏良, 1989.我国蒸发力计算的气候学方法[J].南京气象学院学报, 12(1): 19-33.DOI: 10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.1989.01. 003.Tong H L , 1989.A climatic calculation method for the evaporation power in China[J].Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology, 12(1): 19-33.DOI: 10.13878/j.cnki.dqkxxb.1989. 01.003 . |
null | 王梅, 王建波, 那景坤, 2004.E-601型蒸发器水面蒸发实验分析[J].黑龙江水专学报, 31(3): 10-12.DOI: 10.13524/j.2095-008x.2004.03.004.Wang M , |
null | |
null | 王晓丹, 张勃, 马彬, 等, 2022.基于日值SPEI东北地区近58a干旱时空演变特征[J].高原气象, 41(3): 721-732.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2021.00015.Wang X D , |
null | |
null | 王永义, 2006.水面蒸发计算方法及其检验[J].地下水, 28(1): 15-16, 22+22. |
null | |
null | 王远明, 张祎, 李成荣, 1999.宜昌站水面蒸发折算系数分析[J].人民长江, 30(1): 41-42+45.DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.1999.01.016.Wang Y M , |
null | |
null | 张强, 邹旭恺, 陈鲜艳, 等, 2022.考虑多尺度和蒸散影响的新干旱指数研究——以云南为例[J].高原气象, 41(4): 909- 920.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2021.00026.Zhang Q , |
null | |
null | 张子涵, 王学佳, 杨梅学, 等, 2023.黄河上游水源涵养区近 60 年关键气候要素的时空变化[J].高原气象, 42(6): 1372-1385.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2023.00011.Zhang Z H , |
null | |
null | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2017. 干湿气候等级: GB/T 34307-2017 [S].北京: 中国标准出版社: 12.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2017.Grades of dry/wet climate: GB/T 34307-2017 [S].Beijin: Standards Press of China: 12. |
null | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2017. 气象干旱等级: GB/T 20481-2017 [S].北京: 中国标准出版社: 8-13.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of China, 2017.Grades of meteorological drought: GB/T 20481-2017 [S].Beijing: Standards Press of China: 8-13. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |