WRF模式中初始土壤温湿度对华北冬季近地面要素预报的影响 

展开
  • 1. 河北省气象与生态环境重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050021
    2. 中国气象局雄安大气边界层重点开放实验室,河北 雄安新区 071800
    3. 河北省气象科学研究所,河北 石家庄 050021
    4. 中国气象科学研究院灾害天气国家重点实验室,北京 100081

网络出版日期: 2025-12-31

基金资助

河北省气象局青年基金项目(22ky20);河北省重点研发计划项目(22375404D);河北省自然科学基金项目(D2025304001);中国气象科学研究院基本科研业务费专项基金项目(2023Z0042023Z015

Impact of Initial Soil Temperature and Moisture on the Temperature and Relative Humidity at 2 m in the WRF Model over North China in Winter

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Meteorology and Ecological Environment of Hebei ProvinceShijiazhuang 050021HebeiChina
    2. China Meteorological Administration Xiongan Atmospheric Boundary Layer Key LaboratoryXiongan New Area 071800HebeiChina
    3. Hebei Provincial Institute of Meteorological SciencesShijiazhuang 050021HebeiChina
    4. State Key Laboratory of Severe WeatherChinese Academy of Meteorological SciencesBeijing 100081China

Online published: 2025-12-31

摘要

基于WRF模式,研究了来自CMA-GFS分析场、CLDAS融合实况产品两种土壤温、湿度初始场对20231210-25日华北地区近地面温、湿要素预报效果的影响,并分别讨论了初始土壤偏冷/偏暖、偏干/偏湿对2 m气温的影响差异。结果表明:(1)在预报时长21 h之前,以CLDAS为土壤温湿度初始场预报的相对湿度/2 m气温效果较差;在21 h之后,CLDAS初始土壤温湿度对相对湿度/2 m气温的预报效果更好,均方根误差(RMSE)最多降低8. 3%/10%。(2)以CLDAS为土壤温湿度初始场时,由于模式初始场中,大气和土壤温、湿度的数据来源不同,大气和土壤温、湿度通过更多地表向大气输送的感热、潜热通量进行热调整,在21 h达到平衡,故在21 h之后相对湿度/2 m气温的预报效果转优。(3)空间上,在山西南部、河北中南部及其以南地区,CLDAS土壤温湿度为初值预报的相对湿度负偏差更小、日最高气温暖偏差更小、日最低气温暖偏差更大,在河南的预报效果更好,其相对湿度偏差降低了8%,日最高气温偏差减少了1. 5 ℃;在山西北部、河北北部及其以北地区,CLDAS土壤温湿度初值预报的相对湿度负偏差更大,预报的日最高、最低气温均更优。(4)当初始土壤偏湿、偏冷时,2 m气温的预报效果最好,几乎接近于真实气温;当初始土壤偏湿、偏暖时,土壤温湿度初值对2 m气温的预报效果影响较小,2 m气温预报效果整体欠佳。相比土壤温度,土壤湿度初值对2 m气温预报影响更大,当初始土壤偏干时,对地表热通量的影响最大,感热通量更大,潜热通量更小,日最低气温的预报效果更好。

本文引用格式

张 琳, 张卫红, 尹金方, 丁明虎 . WRF模式中初始土壤温湿度对华北冬季近地面要素预报的影响 [J]. 高原气象, 0 : 1 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2025.00058

Abstract

The effects of initial soil temperature and moisture were explored by performing a series of 84-hour numerical simulations form 10 to 25 December 2023using the WRF model with soil temperature and moisture initialized with CMA-GFS forecasts and the China Meteorological Administration Land Data Assimilation Sys‐ temCLDASanalysis respectively. It showed that the relative humidityRH2mand the temperatureT2mat 2 m were poorly during the first 21-hour integration and getting better during the following time integration ini‐ tialized with CLDAS than that with CMA-GFSwith a maximum root mean square errorRMSEdecrease of 8. 3% and 10% respectively. Further diagonosis indicated that the first 21-hour integration usually a accompanied with more sensible and latent heat fluxes in case of the soil temperature and moisture initialized with CLDAS. It means that the model would take a longer spin-up time during which any satisfiable forecasted T2m and RH2m might not be gottendue to the in consistanece in initial conditions which came from the different source datasets containing some more reliable variables although. Spatiallywhen the model was initialized with CLDASit rep‐ resented much more favourable with smaller negative deviation of RH2m and positive deviation of the daily max‐ imum T2mwhich maximally decreased by 8% and 1. 5 °C in Henan respectivelyand unfavourable with larger positive deviation of the daily minimum T2m in the southern region of Shanxi and central Hebei. Whereasit rep‐ resented pretty well performance of daily maximum and minimum T2m and bad performance of RH2m with larg‐ er negative deviation in the northern region of northern Shanxi and northern Hebei. Among groups of initial soil conditionsthe moister and colder initial soil group had the best forecasting performance of T2m which is tightly closed to the observationand the moister and warmer initial soil group has the worst although the T2m differ‐ ence between the simulations initialized with CLDAS and CMA-GFS is small. Compared with the initial soil tem‐ peraturethe initial soil moisture has a greater impact on T2m. The drier initial soil would lead to a better fore‐ casting performance of daily minimum T2maccompanied with larger sensible heat flux and smaller latent heat flux in the integration.

文章导航

/