论文

几种通量资料修正方法的比较

  • 柳媛普 ,
  • 李锁锁 ,
  • 吕世华 ,
  • 奥银焕 ,
  • 高艳红
展开
  • 中国气象局兰州干旱气象研究所/甘肃省干旱气候变化与减灾重点实验室/中国气象局干旱气候变化与减灾重点开放实验室,? 甘肃 兰州730020;2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所 寒旱区陆面过程与气候变化重点实验室/若尔盖高原湿地生态系统研究站, 甘肃 兰州730000

网络出版日期: 2013-12-28

Comparison of Flux Correction Methods for Eddy- Covariance Measurement

Expand

Online published: 2013-12-28

摘要

涡动相关法是利用脉动观测直接计算湍流通量的方法, 被认为是目前最好的测定地表通量的技术方法, 但如果使用不当或没有进行必要的校正, 通量计算所产生的误差和不确定性就会很大。以中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所黄河源区气候与环境综合观测研究站的观测资料为例, 对涡动相关法观测通量资料使用中质量控制的几个关键过程进行对比分析。结果表明, 经过二次坐标旋转与三次坐标旋转之后的感热通量差异不是很大; 经过三次坐标旋转之后的潜热通量较为离散, 而二次坐标旋转之后的潜热通量更为合理; 经过Schotanus虚温修正与未修正的感热通量最大差值达到10 W·m-2以上, 差值最大约占未修正感热通量的10%;  潜热通量的WPL修正与LIU修正差异不是很大, 二者的修正结果非常相似; 计算得到的潜热通量修正项最大可以占未修正潜热通量的6%左右。

本文引用格式

柳媛普 , 李锁锁 , 吕世华 , 奥银焕 , 高艳红 . 几种通量资料修正方法的比较[J]. 高原气象, 2013 , 32(6) : 1704 -1711 . DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00127

Abstract

Eddy covariance method is the way to calculate directly the turbulence flux using the observed turbulence data, and is the best method to observe the surface flux, but it is not used correctly or correct, the errors and uncertainty of flux data is bigger. The observed turbulence data at Maqu station was used to calculate the flux by using the methods of quality control and quality assessment. The results show that: There is small errors for sensible heat flux between double rotation and triple rotation, latent heat flux using triple rotation is discrete than using double rotation and obviously, the double rotation method is reasonable; The difference is about 10 W·m-2 by using Schotanus virtual temperature correcting method, which is about 10 percent of sensible heat flux. The latent heat flux of WPL correction and LIU correction is important, the correcting term is about 6 percent and there is not big difference for two correcting methods.

参考文献

[1]薛根元, 周锁铨, 孙照渤, 等. 陆面过程研究的新进展[J]. 科技通报, 2005, 21(4): 378-395.
[2]姚德良, 谢正桐, 李家春. 禹城地区陆气相互作用耦合模式和观测研究[J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(6): 1076-1082.
[3]Desjardins R L. Carbon dioxide budget of Maize[J]. Agric Forest Meteor, 1985, 36(1): 29-41.
[4]Valentini R P, De Angelis M G, Monaco R, et al. Seasonal net carbon dioxide exchange of a beech forest with the atmosphere[J].Global Change Biology, 1996, 2(2): 199-208.
[5]Vemm S B, Baldocehi D D, Anderson D E, et al. Eddy fluxes of CO2, water vapor and sensible heat over a deciduous forest[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 1986, 36(1): 71-91.
[6]Vemm S B, Kim J, Clement R. Carbon dioxide, water vapor and sensible heat fluxes over a tall-grass prairie[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 1989, 46(1): 53-67.
[7]Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, et al. FLUXNET: A new tool to study temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water and energy flux densities[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 2001, 82(11): 2415-2434.
[8]Hollinger D Y, Kelliher F M, Byers J N, et al. Carbon dioxide exchange between an undisturbed old-growth temperate forest and the atmosphere[J]. Ecology, 1994, 75(1): 134-150.
[9]Lee X, Fuentes J D, Staebler R M, et al. Long-term observations of the atmospheric exchange of CO2 with a temperate deciduous forest in southern Ontario, Canada[J]. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 15975-15984.
[10]王介民, 刘晓虎, 祁永强. 应用涡旋相关方法对戈壁地区湍流输送特征的初步研究[J]. 高原气象, 1990, 9(2): 120-129.
[11]祁永强, 王介民, 贾立, 等. 青藏高原五道梁地区湍流输送特征的研究[J]. 高原气象, 1996, 15(2): 172-177.
[12]刘辉志, 洪钟祥. 青藏高原改则地区近地层湍流特征[J]. 大气科学, 2000, 24(3): 289-299.
[13]李家伦, 洪钟祥, 孙菽芬. 青藏高原西部改则地区大气边界层特征[J]. 大气科学, 2000, 24(3): 301-312.
[14]马耀明, 王介民, 张庆荣, 等. 南沙海域大气湍流通量输送特征分析[J]. 高原气象, 1997, 16(1): 45-51.
[15]王介民, 王维真, 奥银焕, 等. 复杂条件下湍流通量的观测与分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(8): 792-797.
[16]Foken T, Wichura B. Tools for quality assessment of surface based flux measurements[J]. Agric Forest Meteor, 1996, 78(1-2): 83-105.
[17]Webb E K, Pearman G I. Correction of CO2 Transfer Measurements for the Effect of Water Vapour Transfer[M]// Bilger R W ed. Second Australasian Conference on Heat and Mass Transfer. Sydney: University of Sydney, 1977: 469-476.
[18]Webb E K, Pearman G I, Leuning R. Correcting of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer[J]. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 1980, 106: 85-100.
[19]Schotanus P, Nieuwstadt F T M, De Bruin H A R. Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluctuations[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 1983, 26: 81-93.
[20]Liu H P. An alternative approach for CO2 flux correction caused by heat and water vapour transfer[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 2005, 115: 151-168.
[21]Wilczak J M, Oncley S P, Stage S A. Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 2001, 99: 127-150.
[22]McMillen R T. An eddy correlation technique with extended applicability to non-simple terrain[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 1988, 43: 231-245.
[23]Kaimal J C, Wyngard J C. The Kansas and Minnesota experiment[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 1990, 52: 135-149.
[24]Finnigan J J, Clement R, Malhi Y, et al. A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques, Part I: Averaging and coordinate rotation[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 2003, 107: 1-48.
[25]庄金鑫, 王维真, 王介民. 涡动相关通量计算及三种主要软件的比较分析[J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(1): 78-87, doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0534.2013.00009.
[26]朱治林, 孙晓敏, 袁国富, 等. 非平坦下垫面涡度相关通量的校正方法及其在ChinaFLUX中的应用[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2004, 34(增刊2): 37-45.
[27]孙晓敏, 朱治林, 许金萍, 等. 涡度相关测定中平均周期参数的确定及其影响分析[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2004, 34(增刊2): 30-36.
[28]潘竟虎, 刘菊玲. 黄河源区土地利用和景观格局变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(4): 69-74.
[29]李锁锁, 吕世华, 柳媛普, 等. 黄河上游玛曲地区空气动力学参数的确定及其在路面过程模式中的应用[J]. 高原气象, 2010, 29(6): 1408-1413.
[30]Liu H P, Peters G, Foken T. New equations for omnidirectional sonic temperature variance and buoyancy heat flux with a sonic anemometer[J]. Bound-Layer Meteor, 2011, 100: 459-468.
文章导航

/