利用AREM(-YW and SY)、 T213L31\, JAPAN 三个模式对2008年夏半年(5~11月)西南地区（25°~34.5°N, 97°~110.5°E）降水预报进行了统计检验， 并对其中两次强降水过程的预报效果进行对比分析， 以期了解各模式在西南地区的预报效果及特点， 结果表明： （1）小雨－大雨量级JAPAN模式预报情况较好， 暴雨量级T213L31、 JAPAN、 AREM均预报较好， 大暴雨量级AREM-SY模式预报较好。（2）对西南地区的降水预报， T213L31预报偏强情况较多， AREM预报偏弱情况多， JAPAN预报相对适中。（3）在西南地区， 当降水陡增（即实况降水量较前一天大一个量级以上, 且雨量比前一天多5 mm以上）和其后强降水持续阶段， 是各模式预报偏弱情况最可能发生的时期， 同时也是各模式预报效果较差的时段。（4）三个模式在青藏高原东南缘地区均有降水空报现象， AREM模式的降水空报与其在此处存在低涡空报有关。（5）对于西南低涡这一尺度小、 结构复杂的特殊天气系统， 当前模式对其强度、 位置和诱发的强降水预报效果仍有待提高。
Abstract
In order to get the precipitation forecasting performance of three models, namely AREM(YW and SY), T213L31and JAPANin Southwest China, the precipitation forecast from May to Novemberin 2008 was statistically analyzed, and the forecasts for two heavy raincases were verified detailedly. The results show that: （1） JAPAN forecasts well from light to heavy rain grades, T213L31, JAPAN, AREM all forecast well in rainstorm grade, and AREM\|SY forecasts well in heavy rainstorm grade.(2) In southwest China, the rainfall forecasted by T213L31 is heavier than observation, AREM is lighter than observation and JAPAN forecasts relatively moderate.(3) In southwestChina, in the period of rainfall increasing suddenly (comparing with the rainfall of last day, 24 h observation precipitationin the very day is not only more than one grade but also over 5 mm larger) and the heavy rain continuing, models most likely forecast weaker than observation, and have poor precipitation forecasting skill.(4) All of the three models have false rain prediction on the southeast edge of the Qinghai\|Xizang Plateau, and the false rain forecast of AREM perhaps relate to the false forecast of southwest vortex nearby.(5) For southwest vortex, because of its small scale and complex structure, it is still hard today to make accurate prediction for its intensity, location and the inducing heavy rain.
关键词
西南低涡 /
降水 /
预报效果
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
Southwest vortex /
Precipitation /
Forecast performance
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]Tao S, Y Ding. Observational evidence of the influence of the Qinghai\|Xizang (Tibet) Plateau on the occurrence of heavy rain and severe convective storms in China [J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1981, 62: 23-30.
[2]Gao Y, M Tang, S Luo, et al. Some aspects of recent research on the Qinghai\|Xizang Plateau meteorology[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1981, 62: 31-35.
[3]李跃清. 1998年青藏高原东侧边界层风场与长江暴雨洪水的关系[J].大气科学, 2000, 24（5）: 641-648.
[4]罗四维. 青藏高原及其附近地区几类天气系统的研究[M].北京: 气象出版社, 1992.
[5]陈忠明, 徐茂良, 闵文彬, 等. 1998年夏季西南低涡活动与长江上游暴雨[J].高原气象, 2003, 22（2）: 162-167.
[6]王晓芳, 廖移山, 闵爱荣, 等.影响“05.06.25”长江流域暴雨的西南低涡特征[J].高原气象, 2007, 26（1）: 197-205.
[7]陈忠明, 闵文彬, 崔春光. 西南低涡研究的一些新进展[J]. 高原气象, 2004, 23(增刊): 2-5.
[8]陈忠明, 闵文彬, 缪强, 等. 高原涡与西南涡耦合作用的个例诊断[J]. 高原气象, 2004, 23（1）: 75-80.
[9]邹波, 陈忠明. 一次西南低涡发生发展的中尺度诊断[J]. 高原气象, 2000, 19（2）: 141-149
[10]段海霞, 陆维松, 毕宝贵.凝结潜热与地表热通量对一次西南低涡暴雨影响分析[J].高原气象, 2008, 27（6）: 1315-1323.
[11]张秀年, 段旭. 低纬高原西南涡暴雨分析[J]. 高原气象, 2005, 24（6）: 941-947.
[12]宇如聪, 薛纪善, 徐幼平, 等. AREM 中尺度暴雨数值预报模式系统[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2004.
[13]宇如聪. 一个η坐标有限区域数值预报模式对1993年中国汛期降水的实时预报试验[J]. 大气科学, 1994, 18(3): 284-292.
[14]宇如聪, 曾庆存, 彭贵康, 等. “雅安天漏”研究Ⅱ数值预报试验[J]. 大气科学, 1994, 18(5): 535-551.
[15]何光碧, 顾清源, 陈静, 等.AREM模式对“05.7”四川大暴雨的敏感性试验[J].暴雨灾害,2007, 26(3): 199-204.
[16]李川, 陈静, 何光碧. 青藏高原东侧陡峭地形对一次强降水天气过程的影响[J].高原气象, 2006, 25（3）: 442-450.
[17]Yu Rucong, Li Wei, Zhang Xuehong, et al. Climatic features related to eastern China summer rainfall in the NCAR CCM3[J]. Adv Atmos Sci, 2000, 17(4): 503-518.
PDF(1515 KB)
